Μετάφραση και ανάλυση λέξεων από την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ChatGPT
Σε αυτήν τη σελίδα μπορείτε να λάβετε μια λεπτομερή ανάλυση μιας λέξης ή μιας φράσης, η οποία δημιουργήθηκε χρησιμοποιώντας το ChatGPT, την καλύτερη τεχνολογία τεχνητής νοημοσύνης μέχρι σήμερα:
- πώς χρησιμοποιείται η λέξη
- συχνότητα χρήσης
- χρησιμοποιείται πιο συχνά στον προφορικό ή γραπτό λόγο
- επιλογές μετάφρασης λέξεων
- παραδείγματα χρήσης (πολλές φράσεις με μετάφραση)
- ετυμολογία
by force of will - translation to ρωσικά
![[[Muhammad Ali Jinnah]]'s will, excerpt](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Quaid-i-Azam's Will at Islamia College Peshawar.jpg?width=200 "[[Muhammad Ali Jinnah]]'s will, excerpt")
![Last will and testament of [[Tennessee Williams]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Tennessee williams will.jpg?width=200 "Last will and testament of [[Tennessee Williams]]")
наследник (недвижимости по завещанию)
![[[Bas relief]] of Maimonides in the [[U.S. House of Representatives]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Flickr - USCapitol - Maimonides (1135-1204).jpg?width=200 "[[Bas relief]] of Maimonides in the [[U.S. House of Representatives]]")
![[[René Descartes]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Frans Hals - Portret van René Descartes.jpg?width=200 "[[René Descartes]]")
![taxonomy]] of philosophical positions regarding free will and determinism](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/FreeWillTaxonomy4.svg?width=200 "taxonomy]] of philosophical positions regarding free will and determinism")
![[[Arthur Schopenhauer]] claimed that phenomena do not have freedom of the will, but the will as [[noumenon]] is not subordinate to the laws of necessity (causality) and is thus free.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Schopenhauer.jpg?width=200 "[[Arthur Schopenhauer]] claimed that phenomena do not have freedom of the will, but the will as [[noumenon]] is not subordinate to the laws of necessity (causality) and is thus free.")
![taxonomy]] of philosophical positions regarding free will and theological determinism<ref name="stanfordforeknowledge" />](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/TheologicalDeterminismXFreeWill.svg?width=200 "taxonomy]] of philosophical positions regarding free will and theological determinism<ref name=\"stanfordforeknowledge\" />")
![[[Thomas Hobbes]] was a classical compatibilist.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Thomas Hobbes (portrait).jpg?width=200 "[[Thomas Hobbes]] was a classical compatibilist.")
![determined]] completely by laws of physics.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Toppledominos.jpg?width=200 "determined]] completely by laws of physics.")
Ορισμός
Βικιπαίδεια
The use of force, in the context of law enforcement, may be defined as the "amount of effort required by police to compel compliance by an unwilling subject".
Use of force doctrines can be employed by law enforcement officers and military personnel on guard duty. The aim of such doctrines is to balance the needs of security with ethical concerns for the rights and well-being of intruders or suspects. Injuries to civilians tend to focus attention on self-defense as a justification and, in the event of death, the notion of justifiable homicide.
Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient.
For the English law on the use of force in crime prevention, see Self-defence in English law. The Australian position on the use of troops for civil policing is set out by Michael Head in Calling Out the Troops: Disturbing Trends and Unanswered Questions; compare "Use of Deadly Force by the South African Police Services Re-visited" by Malebo Keebine-Sibanda and Omphemetse Sibanda.
